[Note : The latest position of unsettled appeals is
shown in either (a) Table of Appeals to Court of First Instance or (b)
Table of Appeals to Court of Appeal/Court of Final Appeal. When the
final outcome of an appeal is known, the position is set out in either
table and will disappear in the next issue of Board of Review
Decisions.]
|
Decision
No
|
|
PENALTY TAX -
|
|
incorrect tax return - whether interest rate
excessive - s 82A of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ('IRO')
|
D78/02
(PDF file)
D78/02 (Word file)
|
|
PERSONAL ASSESSMENT -
|
|
whether result of personal assessment fair and equitable - whether the
Commissioner should exercise the discretion provided in s 64(2) - whether the
provisions of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ('IRO') are unfair or against the
Basic Law - ss 5(1), 5(1A), 41, 42, 42A, 43 and 64(2) of the IRO - Articles 8,
11 and 25 of the Basic Law
|
D64/02
(PDF file)
D64/02 (Word file)
|
PROFITS TAX -
|
|
partnership - loss carried forward by a partner - whether set off available
- s 19C of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ('IRO')
|
D65/02
(PDF file)
D65/02 (Word file)
|
whether the sale of a property was trading in nature - it was crucial
to ascertain the intention of the appellant at the time of acquisition
of the property - the stated intention of the appellant was not decisive
- actual intention had to be determined objectively - burden of proof on
the appellant - definition of 'trade' - incumbent on the appellant to
substantiate his contention - ss 2, 14(1) and 68(4) of the Inland Revenue
Ordinance ('IRO')
|
D70/02
(PDF file)
D70/02 (Word file)
|
whether certain sums are deductible as outgoings and expenses
under s 16(1) - mere compliance with s 16(1) is not sufficient,
it must also not be excluded under s 17(1) - whether the transaction
was 'artificial or fictitious' - any contemporaneous document in
support - must show he did incur liability for rental in respect of
such user and the amounts claimed were attributable to the liabilities
which he so incurred - burden of proof on the appellant - ss 14, 16,
17, 61 and 68(4) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ('IRO')
|
D82/02
(PDF file)
D82/02 (Word file)
|
ss 16(1), 17, 61 and 68(4) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance
('IRO') - whether or not an expense was incurred for the
production of assessable profits - whether or not management
fees are capable of sub-division and analysis - whether or
not artificial transactions - burden of proof on taxpayer
|
D85/02
(PDF file)
D85/02 (Word file)
|
sale of a three-storey house erected on a piece of New
Territories land - definition of 'trade' - whether chargeable
to property tax - depends on whether the sale of a property is
trading in nature - it is crucial to ascertain the intention of
the taxpayer at the time of acquisition of the property - the
stated intention of the taxpayer is not decisive - actual intention
has to be tested against objective facts and circumstances -
evidence is needed to substantiate the contention of the taxpayer -
the circumstances and facts of the case cast doubt on the veracity
of the taxpayer - burden of proof on the taxpayer - ss 2, 14(1), 16
and 68(4) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ('IRO')
|
D93/02
(PDF file)
D93/02 (Word file)
|
whether the gains arising from the disposal of property were liable
for profits tax - whether expenses should be allowed - ss 14(1) and
68(4) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance. [Decision in Chinese]
|
D94/02
(PDF file)
D94/02 (Word file)
|
ss 14(1) and 68(4) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance -
intention at the time of acquisition - onus of proof
on the appellant to show that the intention to invest
on capital asset was realistic and realizable. [Decision in Chinese]
|
D97/02
(PDF file)
D97/02 (Word file)
|
sale of small house building - whether beneficial owner.
[Decision in Chinese]
|
D99/02
(PDF file)
D99/02 (Word file)
|
PROPERTY TAX -
|
|
whether certain items can be deducted from the rental income for the
purpose of arriving at a net sum chargeable to property tax -
legislature allows a flat rate of 20% per annum deduction for 'repairs
and outgoings' - includes any cost of repair of the building that the
owner may have to contribute - deduction for rates - appellants must
show the rates were the subject of agreement between them and the
tenant - neither here nor there that the appellants may have incurred
over 20% of their rental income on repair - burden on appellants to
show what actual cost of repair or maintenance was incurred or whether
they did incur repair or maintenance cost higher than the 20% allowance
- ss 5, 5B and 42 of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ('IRO') - s 10B(1)
and (2) of the Interpretation and General Clauses Ordinance
|
D71/02
(PDF file)
D71/02 (Word file)
|
whether rental income derived from the leasing of car-parking spaces
in the common area of a housing estate subject to property tax - should
all owners be named - uncertainty over the identities of co-owners -
whether owners of non-residential units liable - ss 5(1), 5B(2), 51,
56A, 59(2)(b), 63 and 68(8) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ('IRO')
|
D80/02
(PDF file)
D80/02 (Word file)
|
SALARIES TAX -
|
|
gratuity - whether upon termination of employment - s 9(2)
of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ('IRO')
|
D60/02
(PDF file)
D60/02 (Word file)
|
onus of proof - s 68 of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ('IRO')
- no legitimate expectation that the Inland Revenue Department ('IRD') would
anticipate what the tax representative might say shortly before the hearing
of the appeal - whether or not required to identify the employer concerned -
grounds to challenge assessment based on assets betterment statement -
frivolous and vexatious appeal
|
D69/02
(PDF file)
D69/02 (Word file)
|
s 12(1)(a) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ('IRO') - whether
medical expenses incurred in the course of producing income or for the purpose
of producing income
|
D72/02
(PDF file)
D72/02 (Word file)
|
discourteous treatment by the Revenue - no relevance to tax liability
|
D73/02
(PDF file)
D73/02 (Word file)
|
ss 8, 9 and 68(4) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ('IRO') - whether
or not the bonus was part of the remuneration payable and paid to the taxpayer under
the employment agreement
|
D74/02
(PDF file)
D74/02 (Word file)
|
employment - source of income - whether liable to salaries tax
- whether rental value assessable - foreign marriage - ss 2, 8(1), 8(1A), 8(1B),
9(1)(b), 9(2) and 29(1)(a) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ('IRO') - hearing
in the absence of the appellant
|
D76/02
(PDF file)
D76/02 (Word file)
|
s 9(1) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ('IRO') - whether expenses
incurred in order to place the appellant in a position in which he was able to
earn part of the assessable income or expenses incurred in the production of the
assessable income - whether or not the bonus constitutes part of the appellant's
income
|
D81/02
(PDF file)
D81/02 (Word file)
|
home loan deduction - attorney of estate - mortgage repayment
- whether home loan interest - s 26E of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ('IRO')
|
D84/02
(PDF file)
D84/02 (Word file)
|
whether artificial transaction - whether contract of service -
s 61 of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ('IRO') - whether delay in taking action
by the Commissioner
|
D86/02
(PDF file)
D86/02 (Word file)
|
whether salaries tax is chargeable on a sum paid as provident
scheme contribution by an employer directly to the provider of an employee's
personal pension account overseas - it is neither paid to the taxpayer as salary
- nor at no time did the taxpayer have direct control of - ss 8(1), 9(1), 9(2A),
11B, 11D and 68(4) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance ('IRO')
|
D89/02
(PDF file)
D89/02 (Word file)
|
application under s 70A of the Inland Revenue Ordinance
('IRO') for correction of the assessment - intention of s 70A of the IRO -
powers of assessor to correct errors - what sort of error envisaged by s
70A - whether that error on the part of the assessor constituted an arithmetical
error or omission in the calculation of the amount of the assessable income
within the meaning of s 70A - erred in construing the word 'entitled' as 'paid'
is not the sort of error envisaged by s 70A - laxity on the part of the appellant
in processing its case - repeated opportunities to rectify the error - failed to
properly exercise his rights to challenge the assessment under ss 64(1) and 66 of
the IRO - ss 9A(1), 51(1), 59(2), 64(1), 66, 68, 70 and 70A of the IRO
|
D91/02
(PDF file)
D91/02 (Word file)
|
employment - source of income - s 8(1), 8(1A) and 8(1B) of the
Inland Revenue Ordinance ('IRO') - costs - nature of advice
|
D95/02
(PDF file)
D95/02 (Word file)
|
whether salaries tax chargeable - whether relationship between
employer and employee existed - whether provision of service by self-employment
- the relevant guidelines and fundamental test - necessary to consider all the
objective facts, evidence and overall circumstances of the case - burden of proof
on the appellant - ss 8, 12(1), 14 and 68(4) of the Inland Revenue Ordinance
('IRO'). [Decision in Chinese]
|
D96/02
(PDF file)
D96/02 (Word file)
|
back
|
|